论坛首页 Java版 领域模型

NetBeans vs Eclipse 最新战报!呵呵!

浏览 15221 次
该帖已经被评为隐藏帖
作者 正文
时间:2008-07-02

NetBeans: The Ultimate Linux IDE

本文只截取最后一部分,想看原文,请点击下面的地址.(偶的翻译能力不够,就看英语原文吧! )

原文:http://netbeans.dzone.com/articles/netbeans-the-ultimate-linux-id

NetBeans vs Eclipse

The current trend is that many are coming out of their own version of Eclipse. The vanilla Eclipse has a lot less to offer. Although there are commercial alternatives, they are too greedy. As I see it, the problem with Eclipse is that it was designed to be a good platform for numerous commercial products. So it lags behind in terms of features. Thus, companies can add more features (I would say basic features) to a commercial version of it and charge money. This is not the case with NetBeans. All the greatest and best features are available to use, right away. There is no need to buy a NetBeans-based commercial IDE to have all the features. If you ask me, Eclipse is a platform, and not an IDE.

NetBeans Face-To-Facts with Eclipse 

Feature Eclipse
NetBeans
Download and Installation Eclipse comes without automated installer. Users are supposed to install it manually and configure all the necessary prerequisites.
Automated cross-platform installer is provided, which also detects all platform perquisites.
Java Enterprise Support Does not come pre-configured with any of the Java EE servers. You must do it on your own.
Popular application servers like Glassfish and Apache Tomcat are already bundledwith the installation. Just start compiling your servlets.
UML Modelling
Is very basic and needs to be installed separately.
Advanced and out of the box availability. It separately. supports eight types of UML diagrams, including activity diagrams, class diagrams, collaboration diagrams, component diagrams, deployment diagrams, sequence diagrams, state diagrams, and use case diagrams.
BPEL Support
Is very basic, and needs to be installed
and configured separately.
Advanced and out-of-the-box support. It is also supported by an enterprise pack,which includes SOA tools as well.
JavaDocs Online Help Fails to render help from jar files
Render it.
Collaborative Development Need plug-ins.
Out-of-the-box support for CVS and Mercurial.
Visual Web Development tools This is limited, need plug-ins.
Advanced, and built in.
Java SE
Incomplete support. Features like generics are missing
Full support.
Non-Java support
Need plug-ins. Out of the box support for C, C++, Ruby. PHP \development is under process.
XML editor
Need plug-ins. Out-of-the-box support.
GUI Designer
Need plug-ins. Powerful and feature rich support for SWING via Matisse.
Mobile development
Limited support, Need plug-ins.
Ready to go.


In the next article we will do some cool things with NetBeans. NetBeans can be used as an IDE, DB designer, source control tool, unit tester, and many more. And yes, you can write your own plug-ins for it. We will cover one role at a time.

   
时间:2008-07-02
怎么看怎么都感觉广告成分多过于介绍。
   
0 请登录后投票
时间:2008-07-02
这玩意没什么意义。一个是集成的很多功能的,一个没有集成而有大量插件可选。
就是策略上的区别么。
   
0 请登录后投票
时间:2008-07-02
引用
怎么看怎么都感觉广告成分多过于介绍。

说实话,我的确是在为NetBeans做广告! 因为它真的好用!
   
0 请登录后投票
时间:2008-07-02
观注ing!!
   
0 请登录后投票
时间:2008-07-02
  我还是那样的观点, Eclipse 与 NetBeans 不是同类的东西。 Eclipse 是一个平台,而 NetBeans 只是一个 IDE。拿一个平台跟一个IDE 来比,自然是在很大的偏差。

  要拿就应该拿在 Eclipse 平台上做成的IDE来比,例如 MyEclipse, Jbuilder for Eclipse 之类跟 NetBeans 来比。
   
0 请登录后投票
时间:2008-07-02
我觉得还是netbeans强,不管是myeclipse还是jbuilder for eclipse.
   
0 请登录后投票
时间:2008-07-02
我喜欢eclipse
   
0 请登录后投票
时间:2008-07-02
delphixp 写道
  我还是那样的观点, Eclipse 与 NetBeans 不是同类的东西。 Eclipse 是一个平台,而 NetBeans 只是一个 IDE。拿一个平台跟一个IDE 来比,自然是在很大的偏差。

  要拿就应该拿在 Eclipse 平台上做成的IDE来比,例如 MyEclipse, Jbuilder for Eclipse 之类跟 NetBeans 来比。


说到平台,NetBeans 也是一个平台 ,和eclipse 一样都是基于插件形式的平台.
NetBeans在自己的平台上做的比eclipse强多了,我这里对比是
他们原生支持的对比,免费与免费之间的对比,不要拿免费的东西和收费的东西对比,顺便问一句有多少人用那些收费的eclipse是付过钱的.如果NetBeans也推出收费版本,我想NetBeans 并不会比那些收费的eclipse 差,甚至更加的出色!
   
0 请登录后投票
时间:2008-07-02
都差不多 主要 看谁 集成插件 集成的全呗。。。。。。。
   
0 请登录后投票
论坛首页 Java版 领域模型

跳转论坛:
JavaEye推荐